<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Industrial Plant Safety &#187; Environmental Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://industrialplantsafety.com/category/environmental-issues/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://industrialplantsafety.com</link>
	<description>A Blog to discuss Industrial Safety</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Shell Oil Spill in Nigeria could be the worst spill in a decade</title>
		<link>http://industrialplantsafety.com/shell-oil-spill-nigeria-bonga-worst-in-decade.html</link>
		<comments>http://industrialplantsafety.com/shell-oil-spill-nigeria-bonga-worst-in-decade.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispersants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fpso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naval ships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nigeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigerian National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offtake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil tanker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Ibador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainbow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety precaution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shell oil]]></category>
<category>bonga</category><category>cleanup</category><category>dispersants</category><category>environmental disaster</category><category>export pipeline</category><category>fpso</category><category>naval ships</category><category>nigeria</category><category>offtake</category><category>oil field</category><category>oil spill</category><category>oil spill detection</category><category>oil tanker</category><category>production storage</category><category>rainbow</category><category>safety precaution</category><category>sheen</category><category>shell</category><category>shell oil</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://industrialplantsafety.com/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dec 22, 2011, Lagos- A large oil spill from Shell&#8217;s Bonga oil field, which is about 75 miles off the coast of Nigeria,  is reportedly the worst such spill reported in a decade, say news reports. Reports vary of how large the spill is, from some reports saying it has affected 115 miles of ocean [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dec 22, 2011, Lagos</strong>- A large oil spill from Shell&#8217;s Bonga oil field, which is about 75 miles off the coast of Nigeria,  is reportedly the worst such spill reported in a decade, say news reports. Reports vary of how large the spill is, from some reports saying it has affected 115 miles of ocean to other more severe ones, saying it is at least 320 square miles large. Shell estimates that about 40,000 barrels of oil may have leaked into the ocean. The entire Bonga oil field was shut down as a safety precaution.</p>
<p>The oil spill apparently occurred due to a rupture in a flexible export pipeline running from an FPSO in the  Bonga field to an oil tanker. (FPSO is an acronym used in the Oil &amp; Gas industry for Floating Production Storage and Offtake vessels).</p>
<p>The source of the leak has been plugged, said Peter Ibador, head of the Nigerian National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency, say news reports.</p>
<p>But the spill has started moving towards to coast and poses a serious threat to the environment, adversely affecting birds, fish and other marine life. Experts from Britain have been called to help, as have been Nigerian naval ships who have been pressed into action to help with the cleanup. Infra red equiopment is being used to find out places where the sheen is thicker and dispersants are being used to clear it up.</p>
<p>Shell now says that about 50% of the oil has already been dissipated or evaporated, though a rainbow like sheen can still be seen on the ocean&#8217;s surface.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://industrialplantsafety.com/shell-oil-spill-nigeria-bonga-worst-in-decade.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Du Pont fined $750,000 by the NJ Department of Environmental Protection</title>
		<link>http://industrialplantsafety.com/du-pont-fined-750000-department-environmental-protection.html</link>
		<comments>http://industrialplantsafety.com/du-pont-fined-750000-department-environmental-protection.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dupont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazardous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
<category>Chemical</category><category>chemical spill</category><category>delaware</category><category>dupont</category><category>environment</category><category>epa</category><category>facility</category><category>fine</category><category>Hazard</category><category>hazardous</category><category>new jersey</category><category>safety</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://industrialplantsafety.com/?p=973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dec 12, 2011, Washington DC- It appears that DuPont may be fined $750,000 by the The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, says a report published by WDEL. The fine is for more than 60 violations of safety and environmental standards at a facility near the Delaware Memorial Bridge.
Apparently some hazardous substances were improperly handled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dec 12, 2011, Washington DC</strong>- It appears that DuPont may be fined $750,000 by the The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, says a report published by WDEL. The fine is for more than 60 violations of safety and environmental standards at a facility near the Delaware Memorial Bridge.</p>
<p>Apparently some hazardous substances were improperly handled and discharged at its Chambers Works facility in Salem County.</p>
<p>In 2006, DuPont was fined $105,000 after the department investigated more than 220 chemical spills at the site. In addition to the fine, the company must also furnish a plan to improve chemical handling procedures at the facility.</p>
<p>It was not clear how the quantum of the fine was decided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://industrialplantsafety.com/du-pont-fined-750000-department-environmental-protection.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Environment Day-Some thoughts</title>
		<link>http://industrialplantsafety.com/world-environment-day.html</link>
		<comments>http://industrialplantsafety.com/world-environment-day.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elearning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gusher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polluted planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[save fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[save paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world environmental day]]></category>
<category>BP</category><category>debt</category><category>e-learning</category><category>environment</category><category>gusher</category><category>legacy</category><category>oil spill</category><category>polluted planet</category><category>pollution</category><category>sustainable development</category><category>world</category><category>world environmental day</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://industrialplantsafety.com/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[June 5, 2010 -So today is World Environment Day. We&#8217;re in the midst of an oil leak and spill disaster, so now is a good time to think where we&#8217;re moving. Is the planet less polluted today than some decades ago, before the environment was given its due importance. We think no, todays pollution levels [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>June 5, 2010 -So today is World Environment Day. We&#8217;re in the midst of an oil leak and spill disaster, so now is a good time to think where we&#8217;re moving. Is the planet less polluted today than some decades ago, before the environment was given its due importance. We think no, todays pollution levels seem far below the levels that were seen in the 1950s and 1960s. This is because of more stringent norms, government oversight through organisations like the EPA and other &#8220;non-state&#8221; actors like environmental watchdogs like Greenpeace and others. Today the smoke belching, gas spewing factory may be a rarity, but is it because of the above mentioned things or is it because most of these have shifted to China? BTW there you can still witness these smoking chimneys and soot that hangs in the air, especially during winter when it all turns into a thick smog and haze.</p>
<p>As far as disasters are concerned, the BP incident is a rare event these days-more of a black swan event-not that I am saying that it could not have been predicted or that the response could not have been better, but that it was really perhaps the first incident in which a blowout preventer failed. Or was it really the first one, as BP claims? Have there been other incidents in the past when these devices failed? Perhaps someone in the Oil and Gas industry should come out with statistics.</p>
<p>But, I digress here. Today on the occasion of World Environment Day, we should all pause to think whether we are really making the environment a better place over the years or worse? Is todays economic model sustainable? For how long? What legacy should we gift our children and grandchildren? A polluted planet and tons of Collaterized Debt Obligations (CDOs)? Can&#8217;t we do any better? We better think seriously about it now.</p>
<p>Comments are welcome!</p>
<p>_____________Advt_____________</p>
<p>Be environmentally friendly! Save your fuel and save paper. Throw away your traditional classroom training and embrace <a href="http://www.abhisam.com">e-learning</a>! Learn more <a href="http://www.abhisam.com">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://industrialplantsafety.com/world-environment-day.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oil tanker collision in Texas causes big oil spill</title>
		<link>http://industrialplantsafety.com/oil-tanker-collision-in-texas-causes-big-oil-spill.html</link>
		<comments>http://industrialplantsafety.com/oil-tanker-collision-in-texas-causes-big-oil-spill.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case studies industrial accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h2s leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen sulfide gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil tanker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vapors]]></category>
<category>collision</category><category>h2s leak</category><category>hydrogen sulfide gas</category><category>oil spill</category><category>oil tanker</category><category>port arthur</category><category>texas</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://industrialplantsafety.com/?p=537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sunday, Jan 24, 2010-Port Arthur,TX
A collision between an oil tanker (ship) and a barge towing vessel caused an oil spill in the waters off Port Arthur,TX.  The oil spilled is estimated to be about 450,000 gallons, a huge amount by any account.The spill is being cleaned up with booms. Fire and emergency responder officers reported [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunday, Jan 24, 2010-Port Arthur,TX</p>
<p>A collision between an oil tanker (ship) and a barge towing vessel caused an oil spill in the waters off Port Arthur,TX.  The oil spilled is estimated to be about 450,000 gallons, a huge amount by any account.The spill is being cleaned up with booms. Fire and emergency responder officers reported that several blocks of the downtown area had been evacuated. Other reports siad that Hydrogen Sulfide gas is also being emitted from the spilled oil.  The gas, which smells like rotten eggs,  is highly toxic and can be fatal if inhaled in large quantities.<br />
<code><object width="445" height="364" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/YN7HoXK2TEI&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YN7HoXK2TEI&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;border=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></code></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>For a comprehensive training program on <a href="http://www.abhisam.com/GasMon.htm">Gas Monitors</a>, click <a href="http://www.abhisam.com/GasMon.htm">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://industrialplantsafety.com/oil-tanker-collision-in-texas-causes-big-oil-spill.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP fined $87 million over Texas refinery safety issues by OSHA</title>
		<link>http://industrialplantsafety.com/bp-fined-87-million-dollars-over-texas-refinery-safety-by-osha.html</link>
		<comments>http://industrialplantsafety.com/bp-fined-87-million-dollars-over-texas-refinery-safety-by-osha.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accident investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire explosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazardous materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrial Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial safety courses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petrochemical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undesirable events]]></category>
<category>accident</category><category>BP</category><category>compliance</category><category>engineering practices</category><category>fine</category><category>investigation</category><category>OSHA</category><category>safety</category><category>safety practices</category><category>texas city refinery</category><category>texas refinery</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://industrialplantsafety.com/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oct-30, 2009 Washington- The U.S. Department of Labor&#8217;s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) today announced it is issuing $87,430,000 in proposed penalties to BP Products North America Inc. for the company&#8217;s failure to correct potential hazards faced by employees. The fine is the largest in OSHA&#8217;s history. The prior largest total penalty, $21 million, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oct-30, 2009 Washington- The U.S. Department of Labor&#8217;s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) today announced it is issuing $87,430,000 in proposed penalties to BP Products North America Inc. for the company&#8217;s failure to correct potential hazards faced by employees. The fine is the largest in OSHA&#8217;s history. The prior largest total penalty, $21 million, was issued in 2005, also against BP.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="BPTexasCityRefineryExplosion" src="http://www.osha.gov/dep/bp/bpheader.jpg" alt="" width="460" height="119" /></p>
<p>Safety violations at BP&#8217;s Texas City, Texas, refinery resulted in a massive explosion — with 15 deaths and 170 people injured – in March of 2005. BP entered into a settlement agreement with OSHA in September of that year, under which the company agreed to corrective actions to eliminate potential hazards similar to those that caused the 2005 tragedy. Today&#8217;s announcement comes at the conclusion of a six-month inspection by OSHA, designed to evaluate the extent to which BP has complied with its obligations under the 2005 agreement and OSHA standards.</p>
<p>&#8220;When BP signed the OSHA settlement from the March 2005 explosion, it agreed to take comprehensive action to protect employees. Instead of living up to that commitment, BP has allowed hundreds of potential hazards to continue unabated,&#8221; said Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis. &#8220;Fifteen people lost their lives as a result of the 2005 tragedy, and 170 others were injured. An $87 million fine won&#8217;t restore those lives, but we can&#8217;t let this happen again. Workplace safety is more than a slogan. It&#8217;s the law. The U.S. Department of Labor will not tolerate the preventable exposure of workers to hazardous conditions.&#8221;</p>
<p>For noncompliance with the terms of the settlement agreement, the BP Texas City Refinery has been issued 270 &#8220;notifications of failure to abate&#8221; with fines totaling $56.7 million. Each notification represents a penalty of $7,000 times 30 days, the period that the conditions have remained unabated. OSHA also identified 439 new willful violations for failures to follow industry-accepted controls on the pressure relief safety systems and other process safety management violations with penalties totaling $30.7 million.</p>
<p>&#8220;BP was given four years to correct the safety issues identified pursuant to the settlement agreement, yet OSHA has found hundreds of violations of the agreement and hundreds of new violations. BP still has a great deal of work to do to assure the safety and health of the employees who work at this refinery,&#8221; said acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Jordan Barab.</p>
<p>The BP Texas City Refinery is the third largest refinery in the United States with a refining capacity of 475,000 barrels of crude per day. It is located on a 1,200-acre facility in Texas City, southeast of Houston in Galveston County.</p>
<p><strong>Will this large fine serve up a wakeup call to company managements regarding the importance of following safety guidelines and good engineering practices? Only time will tell&#8230;.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://industrialplantsafety.com/bp-fined-87-million-dollars-over-texas-refinery-safety-by-osha.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

